Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

Research article

No difference in factual or conceptual recall comprehension for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking by medical students in the United States: a survey-based observational study: Warren Wiechmann, Robert Edwards, Cheyenne Low, Alisa Wray, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Shannon Toohey; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:8. Published online April 26, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.8

10,406 View
451 Download
1 Web of Science

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
Technological advances are changing how students approach learning. The traditional note-taking methods of longhand writing have been supplemented and replaced by tablets, smartphones, and laptop note-taking. It has been theorized that writing notes by hand requires more complex cognitive processes and may lead to better retention. However, few studies have investigated the use of tablet-based note-taking, which allows the incorporation of typing, drawing, highlights, and media. We therefore sought to confirm the hypothesis that tablet-based note-taking would lead to equivalent or better recall as compared to written note-taking.
Methods
We allocated 68 students into longhand, laptop, or tablet note-taking groups, and they watched and took notes on a presentation on which they were assessed for factual and conceptual recall. A second short distractor video was shown, followed by a 30-minute assessment at the University of California, Irvine campus, over a single day period in August 2018. Notes were analyzed for content, supplemental drawings, and other media sources.
Results
No significant difference was found in the factual or conceptual recall scores for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking (P=0.61). The median word count was 131.5 for tablets, 121.0 for handwriting, and 297.0 for laptops (P=0.01). The tablet group had the highest presence of drawing, highlighting, and other media/tools.
Conclusion
In light of conflicting research regarding the best note-taking method, our study showed that longhand note-taking is not superior to tablet or laptop note-taking. This suggests students should be encouraged to pick the note-taking method that appeals most to them. In the future, traditional note-taking may be replaced or supplemented with digital technologies that provide similar efficacy with more convenience.

Case report

Formative feedback from the first-person perspective using Google Glass in a family medicine objective structured clinical examination station in the United States: Julie Youm, Warren Wiechmann; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:5. Published online March 7, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.5

35,520 View
338 Download
3 Web of Science

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
This case study explored the use of Google Glass in a clinical examination scenario to capture the first-person perspective of a standardized patient as a way to provide formative feedback on students’ communication and empathy skills ‘through the patient’s eyes.’
Methods
During a 3-year period between 2014 and 2017, third-year students enrolled in a family medicine clerkship participated in a Google Glass station during a summative clinical examination. At this station, standardized patients wore Google Glass to record an encounter focused on communication and empathy skills ‘through the patient’s eyes.’ Students completed an online survey using a 4-point Likert scale about their perspectives on Google Glass as a feedback tool (N= 255).
Results
We found that the students’ experiences with Google Glass ‘through the patient’s eyes’ were largely positive and that students felt the feedback provided by the Google Glass recording to be helpful. Although a third of the students felt that Google Glass was a distraction, the majority believed that the first-person perspective recordings provided an opportunity for feedback that did not exist before.
Conclusion
Continuing exploration of first-person perspective recordings using Google Glass to improve education on communication and empathy skills is warranted.

Research article

Efficacy of an asynchronous electronic curriculum in emergency medicine education in the United States: Alisa Wray, Kathryn Bennett, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Warren Wiechmann, Shannon Toohey; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017;14:29. Published online December 11, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.29

31,692 View
241 Download
11 Web of Science
8 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
The aim of this study was to measure the effect of an iPad-based asynchronous curriculum on emergency medicine resident performance on the in-training exam (ITE). We hypothesized that the implementation of an asynchronous curriculum (replacing 1 hour of weekly didactic time) would result in non-inferior ITE scores compared to the historical scores of residents who had participated in the traditional 5-hour weekly didactic curriculum.
Methods
The study was a retrospective, non-inferiority study. conducted at the University of California, Irvine Emergency Medicine Residency Program. We compared ITE scores from 2012 and 2013, when there were 5 weekly hours of didactic content, with scores from 2014 and 2015, when 1 hour of conference was replaced with asynchro-nous content. Examination results were compared using a non-inferiority data analysis with a 10% margin of difference.
Results
Using a non-inferiority test with a 95% confidence interval, there was no difference between the 2 groups (before and after implementation of asynchronous learning), as the confidence interval for the change of the ITE was −3.5 to 2.3 points, whereas the 10% non-inferiority margin was 7.8 points.
Conclusion
Replacing 1 hour of didactic conference with asynchronous learning showed no negative impact on resident ITE scores.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

An Asynchronous Curriculum: Learner Perspectives on Incorporating Asynchronous Learning Into In-Person and Virtual Emergency Residency Didactics
Emily L Jameyfield, Semhar Tesfai, Alejandro A Palma, Adriana S Olson
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of the Pediatric Opioid Analgesia Self‐Instruction System (PedOASIS) tool on pediatric hematology/oncology trainee education
Rebecca E. MacDonell‐Yilmaz, Anarina Murillo, Jennifer G. Welch
Pediatric Blood & Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Development and Validation of Pediatric Opioid Analgesia Self-Instruction System (PedOASIS): An Opioid Knowledge Tool for Pediatric Clinicians
Rebecca E. MacDonell-Yilmaz, Angela Anderson, Priya Hirway, Jennifer G. Welch
Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.2022; 44(1): e204. CrossRef
Utilizing social media for cardiovascular education
Christina Mansour, Nooshin Beygui, Mamas A Mamas, Purvi J Parwani
Heart.2022; 108(15): 1240. CrossRef
Nephrology Trainee Education Needs Assessment: Five Years and a Pandemic Later
Benjamin S. Ko, Kurtis A. Pivert, Rob Rope, Anna M. Burgner, Joshua S. Waitzman, Susan M. Halbach, Suzanne M. Boyle, Lili Chan, Stephen M. Sozio
Kidney Medicine.2022; 4(11): 100548. CrossRef
Planning Engaging, Remote, Synchronous Didactics in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era
Ronald Rivera, Jonathan Smart, Sangeeta Sakaria, Alisa Wray, Warren Wiechmann, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Shannon Toohey
JMIR Medical Education.2021; 7(2): e25213. CrossRef
Pediatric Resident Engagement With an Online Critical Care Curriculum During the Intensive Care Rotation*
Dennis A. Daniel, Sue E. Poynter, Christopher P. Landrigan, Charles A. Czeisler, Jeffrey P. Burns, Traci A. Wolbrink
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine.2020; 21(11): 986. CrossRef
Asynchronous Curriculum “Socially Synchronized”: Learning Via Competition
Jon Smart, Adriana Segura Olson, Andrew Muck
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine.2018; 20(1): 6. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search